Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Perfect Hedge who wrote (40899)	4/22/1998 10:18:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

beebs edit your post and include the link about what they are talking about if you have time before the 15 minutes is up... sheesh...you send me to the "conspiracy" theory without telling me what the conspiracy is..... LOL you know how I like a good conspiracy... now off to hunt for the story...

To: The Perfect Hedge who wrote (40899)	4/22/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: Caroline	Respond to of 58727

It's ridiculously hard to believe. CB

To: The Perfect Hedge who wrote (40899)	4/22/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

beebs, think about it: In any ongoing clinical trial, you're going to have a certain number of trial particants die while the clinical trial is going on. Heart-attack, brain aneurism, etc. Doesn't mean the drug they were taking was the cause of death. If an autopsy revealed that the deaths were the result of something unexplained, believe me there's no way pfizer would go ahead and issue pills that could cause unexplained death in a random small number of users. They're not quite that dumb. Plus, one would think that the FDA wouldn't say "oh, well you only had a couple of unexplainable deaths during the clinical trials. It's a go". Rubbish.