Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NANO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Follies who wrote (1694)	4/23/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: Bosco	Respond to of 2272

Dale - I was in at 12. I ve no problem NANO investing in growth. IMHO, having too much cash on hand without growth is meaningless to tech cos. Being invisible and in an unloved sector are definitely a negative. Prudential coverage is good, but in light of its coverage in the semi and semi cap [it has a $80 target for AMD last year around this time!] it is not the best. If NANO can get noticed by H&Q, GS etc, we are in business. And lord forbid T Kurlak of ML starts mouthing off <g> rgds Bosco