Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Hensley who wrote (14547)	4/23/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: WalleyB	Respond to of 20981

Great article, maybe all is not lost, the pot thickens and so does the sauce in the stir fry! Hmm, it will be a tasty dish once served. I like justice served hot and spicy, how bout you?

To: John Hensley who wrote (14547)	4/23/1998 12:23:00 PM
From: John Hensley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

News from the I.C: Interim Starr Report A Possibility Fight over Secret Service testimony could delay the probe By Bob Franken/CNN WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, April 23) -- A source familiar with Ken Starr's investigation of President Bill Clinton believes there could be long delays caused by the fight over privilege for Secret Service agents. The source confirmed to CNN it is "certainly a possibility" an interim report to Congress will be released by Starr before litigation over issues like Secret Service testimony, executive privilege and Monica Lewinsky's testimony have been resolved in the courts. CNN has been told no final decision has been made. Starr is looking into reports that Clinton had a sexual relationship with Lewinsky, a former White House intern, and encouraged her to lie about it under oath. Clinton has denied both accusations. As part of his investigation, Starr's team would like to hear what Secret Service personnel know of any contacts between the president and Lewinsky. But administration officials are concerned that compelling that testimony could damage the trust and confidence between the president and the people who protect him, indirectly threatening the president's security.