Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (13649)	4/23/1998 12:46:00 PM
From: JRH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 77398

Hey Mindmeld- Congratulations on our good purchases of LU, eh? And Cisco isn't doing half bad either!! In any case, if I am correct, Chambers doesn't like large mergers because they tend to not work to well (case in point: BAY). Because of this, I doubt that LU would try to purchase the Cisco behemoth. Personally, I would rather profit from having those two compete than to profit from an acquisition. Why? Because I am sure that I am going to make money on these two as independents. There are just too many things taht could go wrong with a huge merger like this, IMO. CSCO and LU long, JRH P.S. What does the rest of the thread think about this?