SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zardoz who wrote (10500)4/23/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116759
 
Hutch,
I'd say it doesn't matter if Gold clears $320. TA of the XAU is what
counts. EW can be very helpful, especially in analysis of gold stocks.
Jim



To: Zardoz who wrote (10500)4/23/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116759
 
you might be right..you might be wrong
wondering if utility average will also give us a clue..
seems interest rates have been a major rationalizing reason for
astronomical pes
ps..I think you are wrong
ie..no more fear of Central Bank selling
(geez Germany's holdings look measly compared to equities here)
(article in Barron's about mergers aren't always being successful
might cool some optimism)
(Clinton apparently now focussing on social issues rather than on
business side of economy)
(speculation finally in small caps)
(more mines having closed and companies going bankrupt in resource
sector)
(Placer putting up a lot of money for exploration in another junior)
(possibly mining companies not mentioning further hedging..or at
least I haven't seen them announce taking new positions)
(possibly beginning of new wave of axing)
(Japan backed into a corner ..etc



To: Zardoz who wrote (10500)4/23/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: Giraffe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116759
 
>>I disagree, I say gold does not CLEAR $320. But will sink below $300 in the near term. And I also believe that although TA is not 100%, it's more correct than most want to give credit to it.... But Elliot wave analysis is bunk {can be applied to everything, everywhere}<<

I share your skepticism re. Elliot Wavering - it hurts my feeble little brain to sort through all those waves - but I'm curious as to what TA indicators or tools would tell you that gold won't go above $320?

The garden variety indicators I use give me a pretty good sense of when we're trending or reversing and some good ideas about support and resistance levels but I haven't come across any technical indicators that would say x stock absolutely won't go beyond y price.

I'd be interested to know what you're using to draw that conclusion.



To: Zardoz who wrote (10500)4/27/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116759
 
Hutch,
I know "it ain't over till it's over" BUT Gold getting stronger,
DOW going lower!
rh