SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: werefrog who wrote (6062)4/23/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: johnd  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74651
 
July 97 repeated.

MSFT long term investors probably remember this history.
From March 97 to July 97 MSFT made a huge run up from
around 118 to 150 and it's PE went from 47 trailing to
about 63 trailing. Prior to July 97 EPS report whisper
numbers went as high as 85c for Q497. MSFT came out with
a 80c report. The day after the report, the stock traded
down about 4% to 144 and then continued to the slide to
hit a stable point around 130, where it remained for a long
time. There were a couple of days when it hit 118 (once
when DOJ action was imminent and another time when asia
crisis caused dow to hit 6900.

I see a parallel this past few days. The stock in anticipation
of a significantly above mean EPS (of 48c) report, surged from
a 49 PE to about 63 PE and went from about 80 during first
week of March to about 99 yesterday. MSFT came out with EPS
that beat only the mean estimate but not the whisper. In addition,
similar to July 97, MSFT indicated slower growth and lower EPS
in the following quarter (Note, in Q198 MSFT reported 72c after
an 80c report in Q497). Similar to July 97, the stock is down
about 4% today.

If rest of history repeats, the price will keep come down by about
20% or back to about 84 by later summer. That would still be a
trailing PE of 50.

I am a long term holder of MSFT and haven't either bought or sold
any recently. I plan to wait for it to drop to the 80s before
cost averaging more.

johnd