SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : GOLD-XAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Little Joe who wrote (1458)4/24/1998 2:32:00 AM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1756
 
No question about the truth you've expressed. Geenspan has in the past stated how much he was worried about "irrational exuberance" in stock prices. That was when the DOW was at 6000. Not only stock prices which are financial abstractions, but also real economy is effected by higher interest rates. Because we are still in intrinsic deflation and will be until the 22nd century, incremental tightening has far greater long term deflationary effects. It is very difficult to assess the lagged degree of deflation following a tightening as Alice Rivlin pointed out yesterday. Inevitably the FED will take it slowly because this is the only rational course. Of course, this is the lesson learned from the last ten years, but a sea change has taken place that will cause this cautionary stance to be in error. The error is in underestimating how smart or clever the rest of the world has become in assessing the worth of their labor. The internet is chiefly responsible for the dissemination of this recognition and rising worldwide prosperity has given it momentum. The dissemination has essentially taken place in two years.

The take-it-gradual tightening lets gold race upward because the tightening doesn't effect economy much at first. Consider your own shopping habits. You have have grown jaded and more willing to accept an increase in prices because you are earning more. The wealth effect. A little tightening never hurts anyone, you'll hear. The market will tumble a little and then recover. Growth has momentum. Margins are fat. We can afford to throw a peanut to the economic god. The stock market rises back up, the FED tightens some more, the market backs off, the FED backs off, the market rises up, etc. A general topping occurs during which you have a lovely bull market in gold. Eventually, three steps up in rates and the market tumbles. CRASH. Into the pile of trash. Gold goes down too. The major down trend re-asserts itself. Prechter's deflationary Philistine depression is upon us. The Grand Super Duper Cycle has cycled and spun us into the ditch of destruction. The End. Bob gets his vengeance and Elaine bought at the top. So the FED was never caught between the rocks. What opinion gets us to!