Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Versatech (VITC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (318)	4/24/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Respond to of 435

Sid , in this post , in the first paragraph, you call him a drug dealer, a felon. Message 4024415 Why you go out of your way to make ficticious remarks has always puzzled me.

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (318)	4/24/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 435

I have to say. My immediate response to having Dave Hagen on SI was a sense of disbelief. There are no shareholders here. I think your manipulation of Dave's background provoked him to respond. You said, <Your claim, BTW, that I called you a drug dealer is false.> Your lie....and then your disavowal of your lie....leaves Hagen in a position where he has nothing to win nor lose. You did lie. \https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=4024415 Specifically you said....<Robert: I don't have the papers in front of me, and the official charge was something like "possession of narcotics in the something-or-other degree" but, translated into English, a drug dealer. He had a bunch of other arrests for various things in NY and CT, but I was never able to find out the disposition of those cases.> Now, if you do not mind, I ----AS A SHAREHOLDER___ would like him to go back to work, not engage in the routine combatative action that you carry on....day to day.... across the SI environ. Thank you.