SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: H-Man who wrote (15371)4/24/1998 5:58:00 AM
From: threadneedler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
This latest announcement was great validation for TAVA.

It takes TAVA beyond the pilot stage with one of the worlds major corporations.

This one chased most of my bears back into the woods!!!



To: H-Man who wrote (15371)4/24/1998 7:51:00 AM
From: John316  Respond to of 31646
 
2 Things:

Alot of folks seem to think that the Y2K stocks have just about played out. IMO this is has just been a temporary pull back. The majority of the people I talk with have no idea yet what the severity of the problem is even with a slight increase in news coverage. I mean this "could" be the end of life as we know it right now (temporarily) but the US can't seem to talk about anything but President Clinton and his harem. With increased news coverage and great earnings reports we should see a major resurgence in Year 2000 stocks. With the right setup ATEC, EGNS, TPII and a host of others should be real good investments in the near future and not just over hyped momentum plays. Not in love with any particular company but TAVA looks real good at this level right now.

Secondly, no matter what company TAVA just announced they are working with is, they "seem" to have a very good product for one of the most severe Y2K problems and that is the imbedded chips. The potential for any company that can assist with this particular problem is awesome. Could TAVA announcement be a little hype, yes. But then a good company, for it's shareholders, should look to give as much news as they contractually, truthfully and legally can.

As others post here I would like to know what people say to you when you mention the Y2K problem.