SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Patriot Scientific - PTSC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brewmeister who wrote (4830)4/24/1998 9:27:00 AM
From: bob  Respond to of 8581
 
Dan,

FWIW coming from a layperson I don't think there will be any such
thing as a "standard" java chip. From what I have read the pico
based chips, if and when they make it to market, will be aimed at very
specific applications each. The chips are being designed individually
for their own application(s) but won't be very practical for much else
due to factors such as cost, power, functionality, etc. I think all
the pico chips will be alot more expensive than ours for instance, and
in embedded applications, at least on the low end of things, price-
performance, and not just performance, is the key. Would you use a
$20 chip when you could get the same or better performance out of a
chip costing $10? I don't think so, especially if there were going
to be millions of items produced, like telephones for instance. It is
for this reason along with several other factors such as simplicity of
design and versatility (the number of applications a chip would be used for) that makes the PSC1000 such a strong contender for the
embedded java marketplace. Remember too that it will be imperative
for these chips to process other languages like C/C++ as well as the
world makes it's transition to pure java and the pico chips may not
do that as efficiently. This is all JMHO of course.

Cap