Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Starpoint Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john mcknight who wrote (1978)	4/24/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: Qwerty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2378

John, your right, I checked you have been around for a while, but you have not always had such a positive tune. Look at some of the things you have said in the past. To: +Winer (1448 ) From: +john mcknight Thursday, May 15 1997 1:51PM ET Reply # of 1979 Hi all , Makes you think how co-operative and helpful Diamond works really were to STS this whole thing stinks and I think requires alot of explanation from our Honest management ,Who by the way I had e-mailed three times over the past month and still await a reply and oh yes I was assured by them when the stock dropped 65 cents that they still had the property and would be around for a long while another vancouver rip off but so well done that we still beleive this bunch of incompetants Regards John In fact in the past you have even agreed with me. To: +Qwerty (1451 ) From: +john mcknight Thursday, May 15 1997 2:34PM ET Reply # of 1979 Hi qwerty, That's excactly what i was implying the plot now is unfolding and let's be honest .regardless as to what they turn up in Angola or Uganda there is no commercial credabillity left , it would be like taking candy from kids if they come up with anything the big boys will just take it away AGAIN or lose it like they lost everything else regards john But I think the next post is probably my favourite To: +Mike Paulin (1472 ) From: +john mcknight Thursday, May 22 1997 6:35PM ET Reply # of 1979 Hi Mike, What it means is that the management are getting ready to throw another $400.000 down the drain . Questios 1 Why could the company not raiase $600.000 against a property that had proven reserves? 2 Is the company again going to do the spade work on this property so that some one else can again pick it up cheaply when reserves are proven? This whole business stinks Regards John John I could go on and pull out alot more posts but I think you get my drift. So John are you in the know all of a sudden. John, you might find me negative, but at least I am consistent. Unless something has changed STS will lose this property as well.