Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Galkowski who wrote (3557)	4/24/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: Charger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Thanks, Bill. eom

To: Bill Galkowski who wrote (3557)	4/24/1998 8:04:00 PM
From: virginijus poshkus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Bill, apparently you do not now how to read. When you begin to , let me know. For now, I would suggest that you either get glasses or have someone explain the proper mode of discourse. To tell you the truth, and save you time. I did not address charger initiatially , charger addressed me and I responded. Apparently, you are not well versed on the SI give and take nor are you able to digest facts and constructive comments regarding bcmd and its lack of progress over the years. When you begin to face up to your shortcomings, progresse will have been made. And I hope this happens. vargas

To: Bill Galkowski who wrote (3557)	4/25/1998 7:44:00 AM
From: virginijus poshkus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Bill, one other thing, you asked why I addressed charger. Now think about it."why did you address me, I never posted you." then you make comments that I am back to my old tricks. Hey Bill, people in glass houses should not throw stones. You and Ray have sent me provoking and flaming posts, when in fact I have never posted one negative comment to you personally. Ray says I am half right and gloating, you pick up the batton, and start the personal questions. This thread is not about personal questions, it is about constructive or destructive comments about the company. Yet you and yours cannot get by with facts, you must attack "people with negatives" . This is pure infantile. vargas