Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : QuesTec.com (QSTI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: G.P. who wrote (991)	4/24/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: G.P.	Respond to of 2393

I guess they heard me <g> EOM

To: G.P. who wrote (991)	4/25/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: Proton	Respond to of 2393

Re: Engaging Reality Are the MMs playing games with us? Please, please, please let's not start this nonsense. Every time a seriously speculative stock declines, we hear about the evil market makers. In the case of Questec, the bid/ask spread has to be around 10% because of the low price and relative illiquidity of the stock. Compound the market realities with legitimate skepticism about the status of new contracts (e.g. is there really an imminent contract with Fox, or are they still "testing?"), and it's a wonder the stock declined no further on Friday. If there is one common cycle on S.I., it's the, "greatest thing since sliced bread," "oooooh, those evil market makers," "why isn't the company informing us better," "how could the company have done this to us?" script. I am not saying that this is the case with QSTI, but the precedent for it is considerable. Pý flames > /dev/null

To: G.P. who wrote (991)	4/25/1998 1:57:00 PM
From: R. Dolan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2393

Hey, here's something new. I come in from the garage to catch a few minutes of the Red Sox game. They are playing away at Cleveland (who we know has the system installed) and are being carried this day by the local affiliate station (not NESN, who is affiliated now with Fox). What do I see, the Red Sox commentators using Supervision with the Questec Logo to analize a pitching sequence. Now how do you suppose the Red Sox broadcast affiliate, at an away game, was able to use/given access to Supervision? The Red Sox do not have it installed at Fenway (as far as we know) and have no deals in place with Questec to use Supervision at away games at parks that are wired. I have never seen an away team use Supervision, and this is the 1st time I have seen it on a Red Sox game. Comments? Rick