SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gurupup who wrote (1828)4/25/1998 12:33:00 AM
From: BuzzVA  Respond to of 5736
 
After reading your summary Skipard, I'm still unsure of your opinion of CCSI. Are you long this stock?

Buzz



To: Gurupup who wrote (1828)4/25/1998 3:57:00 AM
From: Shammymoo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5736
 
Skipyard, AMEN...

So sorry to hear of your illness, I will say a prayer for you tonite.
Do you know how much money You & Mayor & Janeybird & Manfred etc.. Have helped me make?? I can't thank you enuff, after foolishly "giving" away my shares before the split announcement, I was fortunate enuff to buy all I owned & more back starting at 15 1/2, and all the way down to the fire sale in the $11's.. (Post split)

If I sold it all now I would have a huge huge profit, and I'd owe you my deepest & sincerest thanks & appreciation... I'd also be a dang fool!! :-) Instead I will be buying more as it rises or falls as the case may be.. Everyday I daytrade other stocks, and every week I take some of my profits and buy more CCSI.. So I can be as happy as our fine owner Darby, when the stock hits $32, and she finally can sell some.. Man, You don't know how thankfull I am already, I just don't know how I'm gonna Thank you in The $30's Skipyard/Mayor! As you say, "do your own research" well I have.. So I guess I can take a little credit myself, but Boy do I owe you a round of drinks or three ;-)

They say "Three Times a Charm", well I gave away my CCSI in the $7's when I bought it at $4, when you first brought CCSI to my attention, & told me all you owned & how you were buying more, I said yeah, right, I'll take the 3 points... :-( Dumb move #1, Then I bought more in the teens, and sold it in the teens for a hefty profit, (So I thought), soon after, the split was announced... :-( Dumb move #2, Now I have have a ton in the $11's & a 1/2 ton all the way up to $15 1/2... Normally, I'd be selling when it hits $20, but not this time around.. no, no, no, "Thrid Times a Charm" and this is my Time to make some, "I can afford two vacation homes, & throw in that huge boat so I can sail back 'n' forth between the two" Kinda Money.. I don't care if it takes years, this company's gonna be right up there with microsoft & Intel, & ya know what, I'll still be sitting around goin' "Well I coulda made even more if I didn't sell it at $7, and my Dad whose holding a ton also will be saying "Be happy for what you did make for me & you", and I'll say "Thank The Mayor & Skipyard & the Big guy upstairs"... :-)

Well I've said my silly little piece, May God Be with all of you who have put up with the nonsense & continued to perservere through thick & thin... If there is a "$32 Party" planned or a "Contract Party" please let me know... There are some hands I'd love to shake..

GoodLuck & GodBless all!
-Glen (GG)

~GodBless those shorts too.. They are gonna need it.. ~ G-Nite :-)



To: Gurupup who wrote (1828)4/25/1998 10:30:00 AM
From: Josef Svejk  Respond to of 5736
 
Humbly report, Skipard, God bless you, Captain --Shakespeare.

Oh, and since you brought up the shorts, and Godot:

From the meanest creature one departs wiser, richer, more conscious of one's blessings. --Beckett

( geocities.com )

All the best to you, praying you cover that health margin call, and live a long, pleasure-filled life,

Svejk
(GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-)



To: Gurupup who wrote (1828)4/25/1998 10:41:00 AM
From: Clayleas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5736
 
From the 8-K;
Wiss' report on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 included a statement, indicating that the financial statements were prepared by Wiss on the assumption that the Company would continue as a going concern. Wiss' report on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 did not contain such statement. Wiss' reports for fiscal years 1996 and 1997 contained no other adverse opinions, disclaimers of opinion or modifications as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

Don't know how I missed this yesterday, but this is the first that I have seen that the auditors have now eliminated the "going concern" opinion and have now issed a "clean" Independent Auditor's Report. This is a very significant positive development!

There are many investors who would only buy into the company with a clean report, and now they can. It will be great to see this widely disseminated when the new 10K is published.

Jim



To: Gurupup who wrote (1828)4/26/1998 6:13:00 AM
From: Mr. Pink  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5736
 
. On April 21, 1998, Wiss & Company, LLP ("Wiss") informed Chromatics
Color Sciences International, Inc. (the "Company") that, based on mutual
determination between the Company and Wiss, it would not stand for re-election
as the Company's principal accountants for the audit of the Company's financial
statements following the completion of its most recent audit of the Company's
financial statements on February 17, 1998 in connection with the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
Wiss' report on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 included a statement, indicating that the financial statements
were prepared by Wiss on the assumption that the Company would continue as a
going concern. Wiss' report on the financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997 did not contain such statement. Wiss' reports for fiscal
years 1996 and 1997 contained no other adverse opinions, disclaimers of opinion
or modifications as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
Within the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim
period preceding Wiss' notification confirming that it would not stand for
re-election, there were no disagreements between the Company and Wiss on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or
auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to Wiss'
satisfaction would have caused it to make reference in connection with its
report to the subject matter of the disagreement.
Wiss has not advised the Company of any reportable events as defined in
paragraphs (A) through (D) of Regulation S-K Item 304(a)(1)(v).
The Company has furnished Wiss with the disclosures the Company is
making in this Form 8-K and has requested Wiss to furnish the Company with a
letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") stating
whether Wiss agrees with the statements made by the Company above, and if not,
stating the respects in which it does not agree. Such letter is filed as an
exhibit to this Form 8-K.
The Company's new Audit Committee is currently finalizing the selection
of an international independent accounting firm. The Company expects to announce
the engagement of such new auditors shortly. Wiss has advised the Company that
they will assist in the preparation of the March 31, 1998 Form 10-Q and will
work with the Company's new auditors in effecting a prompt and orderly
transition.



To: Gurupup who wrote (1828)4/26/1998 6:15:00 AM
From: Mr. Pink  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5736
 
Focus on these words from the 8k

Wiss' report on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 included a statement, indicating that the financial statements
were prepared by Wiss on the assumption that the Company would continue as a
going concern. Wiss' report on the financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997 did not contain such statement.

No Big Six would make the claim either

Have fun,

Mr. Pink