Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark M who wrote (6124)	4/25/1998 2:24:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Mark, forgive me for doing this. But I thought the Then and Now similarity noteworthy. I knew you'd been posting on NETZ for a long time. When you came up with the excellent positions for consideration this evening, out of curiosity I looked back to some of your prior postings. The very last one that's listed in your SI retrievable archive is the following November 29, 1997 post to good ole FTJoe. (By the way, whatever happened to TokyoMex? Has he made his money and run already? Or did he change names and still chips in now and then?) As evidenced by Mark's desperate call for understanding back then, we can see that little has changed on one certain front: nitpicking. But seriously note the price differential and think about all of the constructive changes that have occurred--including the recent website updates (not to mention the acquisition of SIM and the ESVS Nasdaq listing)--since the time you wrote the below posting. Marveling, ain't it? To: +FTJoe (857 ) From: +Mark M Saturday, Nov 29 1997 1:06AM ET Reply # of 1702 I find it hard to believe that a few posters on this thread have installed so much fear in many investors. We can't conclude this is "scam" as well as we can't conclude that this is "100 bagger". One thing is for sure, calling the company's CEO every 2 minutes isn't going to accomplish anything but headaches for all involved. This company is obviously moving at a fast pace, judging by all the recent news releases, and simply does not have the manpower to hold each shareholders hand. If this was a scam, Why would AltaVista enter into an agreement with them? Did they make this up? Why did they issue a correction to the news release? Why wouldn't AltaVista just come out and say that this company made up the release? I strongly feel that many have over reacted in both respects. This is a .34 stock!! As for the InternetWorld, I'm with NETCOM OnLine Communications, and I don't see us listed. Oh ya, and we have a booth there! BTW, I like what I see, and I am aware of the risks...but I'm in and not SPOOKED! CONFIDENT and looking to get more, especially at .34. TokyoMex...please keep downplaying this stock so I can raise some money to buy here at .34.