SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : QUANTUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Simpson who wrote (7779)4/25/1998 2:56:00 AM
From: shane forbes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9124
 
Tom:

On my seagate 87,000 current quarter headcount I pulled that from memory.

I think I first heard about it during the c.call when they mentioned a 13% headcount reduction in the current q.

Anyway I did some searching to try and pacify you guys here (since it would look totally embarrassing to be mis-quoting too many times) and guess what - found a source:

[Ironically it's at the same Seagate website where you hmmmmed...

seagate.com

86,963 in Q3FY1998 ie., 87,000 approx. ]

(General Question to thread: Is this thread the thread of painful nitpicking or what!!! Or better yet the thread of desperately looking for the trees and completely missing the forest thread... - humor...)

More serious question to thread:

Does anyone know in general what the approximate cap.exp spending for this industry is as a group? It would seem to me that if we can detect a marked reduction in the cap.exp. spending from last year and the recent additions then capacity and supply must be coming in line. Of course new competitors are always a pain and those located overseas have perhaps financials that are trickier to locate but nevertheless it seems to me that a cap.exp vs. GB or some such measure of unit volume would be interesting to benchmark. If no one has it I might check into it. Looking at the SEG 12 month run-rate for cap-exp it appears to have dropped off the proverbial cliff recently.

Shane.