Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gabriela Neri who wrote (10610)	4/25/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: Bobby Yellin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116763

what is that? also curious what is your take on Japanese having such low interest rates..I thought it was because they were hoping to use their exports as a way to shore up their economy and it just didn't work.. also heard on CNBC that hedgers are beginning to move into gold.. don't know what abby joseph cohen's latest target is but last I heard DOW 9300 ..we are almost there also heard on news show from a wall street journal reporter that Rubin has no plans of stepping down..(those rumours must have been from bond traders :> I really thought that a blow off in biotechs would be the clincher.. The more I think, the more confused I am getting...except I keep on remembering, in bear markets..stocks can sell way below their value.. also with all the trading going on now..and with reallocations of portfolios some of the liquidity would have to dry up to pay capital gains.. also do you agree with ahhha that lower taxes rather than lower interest rates have helped corporation profits more..it just seems that lower interest rates helped their borrowing so much.. (I guess I am still very optimistic about future..ie one company probably just got limited FDA approval for laser heart surgery.. gee how much money will laser technology save in health costs in the future?..gene therapy etc..technology in exploration of natural resources.,etc....)

To: Gabriela Neri who wrote (10610)	4/25/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: paul ross	Respond to of 116763

You're erect in your analysis.

To: Gabriela Neri who wrote (10610)	4/28/1998 6:26:00 PM
From: goldsnow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116763

>>OFF TOPIC >> Viagra Viagra potency pill is a hit with US women too 04:09 p.m Apr 28, 1998 Eastern By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Praised as a miracle drug for men, Viagra, the first pill for impotence, is also finding a market among women, doctors and analysts said Tuesday. Nearly 150,000 prescriptions have been written for the drug since it went on the market in the United States this month. Many men with sexual problems say it has offered them a new lease on life. But doctors and pharmacists say they are getting plenty of queries from women as well -- and many are not asking on behalf of their partners. ''A lot of women are interested,'' said Dr. Myron Murdoch, a urologist in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is national medical director for the Impotence Institute of America. ''If you think there's a big demand for male sexual dysfunction medicine, wait until women find out they can have some sort of sexual dysfunction medicine.'' In commercial terms, Pfizer's drug is already a blockbuster. During its second week on the market, pharmacists sold more than 113,000 new prescriptions for Viagra, known generically as sildenafil. Hemant Shah, an independent drug analyst in New Jersey, said much of the demand was being driven by women. ''They (pharmacists) are telling me they can't keep it in stock and that both men and women are using it,'' he said. Viagra is not approved for women. It was tested only in men and is designed to act as an ''arousal enhancer,'' getting blood to the penis to help a man get an erection. ''We get a lot of inquiries as to women. This is absolutely inappropriate,'' said Dr. James Barada, a urologist in Albany, New York, who helped draw up erectile dysfunction guidelines for the American Urological Association (AUA). ''It's so far off-label that it's pathetic.'' But once a drug is approved, there is little to stop a doctor from writing an ''off-label'' or unapproved prescription for a woman, though Viagra's makers stress there is as yet no evidence of any good reason to do so. ''This is a drug that has been approved for erectile dysfunction, which is obviously for men, and there is no scientific data to support its use in women,'' said Pfizer spokeswoman Mariann Caprino. Pfizer does have Phase II clinical safety tests underway in Europe in a group of women and some doctors see no reason not to prescribe the drug to women. Murdoch said the vagina and clitoris were made of the same tissue as the penis and a drug that improved blood flow in men would do the same in women. ''Physiologically ... the clitoris is nothing more than a penis without a urethra,'' he said. The urethra carries urine and sperm in men. ''The drugs we are using for male sexual dysfunction, these drugs will be effective in causing increased blood flow in the vagina and in the clitoris, so that women who have lack of lubrication, we can improve that.'' Murdoch said doctors could use drugs, including Viagra, to help women who were worried about losing interest in sex. ''Women who have arousal problems, we can stimulate that. The male hormone testosterone can improve desire in women.'' That could help relationships in general, he said. ''If you can do all this, it certainly should lead to an improvement in sexual relationships between men and women.'' Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited.