Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SAFESKIN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Beltropolis Boy who wrote (284)	4/25/1998 12:04:00 PM
From: Madpinto	Respond to of 828

I hope you had a great time convalescing in Spain. I can see why you were happy to see that article. I believe the analysts earnings est. are too low, and they still think the stock will move up to $48. I'm looking forward to May 7.

To: Beltropolis Boy who wrote (284)	4/25/1998 3:50:00 PM
From: Madpinto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 828

Does anyone have a guess on earnings for 1Q? Estimates are $.20, but I believe anything around this number would disappoint.

To: Beltropolis Boy who wrote (284)	4/26/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: Ann Williams	Respond to of 828

Chris: Welcome back! Hope you had a great time in Spain. Just wanted you to know that my investment club bought SFSK right after my presentation. It was the first time I got them to buy on the first nibble. Let's hope that the earnings news takes us back up to new highs. Good investing! Ann

To: Beltropolis Boy who wrote (284)	4/30/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: Toby Zidle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 828

Thanks, Chris, for posting that article from Microsoft Investor. I had been noticing the subpar performance of SFSK since its high earlier in April and wondering if there was any justification for holding onto the stock. Your posting was perfectly timed for bolstering my patience for long-term investing. Also, I am noticing that the rising 50-day moving average is supporting the stock price now as it has in the past. Thanks again, Chris.