SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: STLMD who wrote (15466)4/25/1998 1:11:00 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Dear Stephen: By George, I think you just might have guessed it. JDN



To: STLMD who wrote (15466)4/25/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: Karl Drobnic  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Good thinking on Cargill a possibility for our "Mystery Client". Cargill has a history of keeping its business quiet. But I still lean to Coke. The phrasing "company owned subsidiaries and independent companies involved in the manufacture and distribution of the company's products" is a very accurate description of the Coke global empire. I suspect it came right out of the master agreement. This description reflects Coke's strategic thinking, and I suspect it is psychologically embedded in Coke's legal department. I'd rather TAVA fix Cargill. The world's supply of grain is very short. The rice supply is 30 days, then people starve. Some other grains are shorter. Grain distribution is highly automated. A major bottleneck will be a major social calamity.



To: STLMD who wrote (15466)4/25/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: B.Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
I think you are on the money here. If you look at the specific locations that TAVA is advertising for help, it could lead one to believe your hypothesis of Cargill. As you mentioned Coke has already been publicly mentioned. Also, I just want to believe this as it would be bringing completely new business to the table. Good call, this is great news. Karl your thoughts?

B.Long