Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : International Nursing Services Inc, old (NURS) new (MDIX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Instock who wrote (607)	4/25/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2911

Scott, MDIX has other things going for it, worth a lot of money, as rt has been saying. But if we are right about the strength of their case, it will be worth good money to MDIX one way or another. As someone with some experience with law suits, and with evaluating whether to file or not, I thought ADRX's response was remarkably weak legally. Any time I've talked about slander or libel to a lawyer the lawyers have been disparaging. It's necessary to prove financial damage and it's very hard to prove libel and slander. From the time that MDIX warned ADRX about the suit to the time ADRX filed their claim there wasn't even time for damage to occur. Furthermore, filing a claim, with any possible merit, as MDIX did, would have to exempt them from charges of libel or slander. After all, if that's all it takes (warning of an impending law suit and then filing one) to constitute a libel or slander case, then all law suits would make the plaintiff vulnerable to such charges.When I saw that was all ADRX could come up with, I felt very confident in the strength of MDIX's case. Sounds like you believe that a contract to be announced this week is the ADRX/MDIX deal. Linda