Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBigSur who wrote (874)	4/25/1998 10:35:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

Hey MrBigSur, that's not a very nice way to be toward other people. I should direct you to the Ask God thread, where you can hone your people skills. I think you owe MrB an apology. Just because he has questions about this stock, and there are plenty of legitimate concerns that have been glossed over with nothing more than hand waving so far, is no reason to be rude.

To: TheBigSur who wrote (874)	4/25/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7491

Well Big Sur, I've always been on the "careful" side. All that's been happening here is asking some relevant questions. A good, careful investor would like that. Where's that put you&#151you sound like you don't want people asking questions about this issue. Why would some tough, real questions&#151instead of cheerleading&#151be harmful? Isn't it good for the stock? Or the investors? You're afraid too many questions will be asked? You picked some good quotes out of my profile. Why do they matter? They don't seem to be relevant to the topic, but let's talk about them anyway since you're so inclined. About "I'm not him..." There's a well-known Y2K consultant who happens to share my name. I occasionally get a question about it. Ever since I put in that quote, most people can figure it out for themselves. Now I'm less bothered with trivial email asking for an explanation&#151except in your case. Your comment falls flat on its face. Thanks for the compliment on my design. Here's one example of what a good Y2K site might look like: magneticdiary.com About the "titty" bar&#151that deserves a comment. Let's show the world what it is: magneticdiary.com As anybody can see, it's simply a "play" on marketing. Pretty obvious from the caption that it's to be taken "tongue-in-cheek"&#151a light-hearted ploy (or play) as anybody can see from exploring the whole site: magneticdiary.com ...it's a minor part of an overall site and marketing picture. So you're comment, which obviously was intended to be negative, actually falls flat on its face. Like you. I'm my own worst enemy? So are you (Mark?).