Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GPW Group West Systems Ltd. (Year 2000 Software Company) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Forthright who wrote (522)	4/26/1998 3:22:00 AM
From: AH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1443

Gary, be a wimp and don't explain yourself.

To: Mr. Forthright who wrote (522)	4/26/1998 5:39:00 AM
From: AH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1443

Let's analyze your contribution to this thread. Just a few of your last postings. Maybe this exercise can shed some light on the reason for your persistent presence on this thread. First you see the posting that raised the subject of the future of Y2K companies after Jan. 1, 2000. In general terms. Gary: 'Sam, I have seen a lot of concern about what all these Y2K co. are going to do come 2000. Most are buying up IT co.s to take them beyond that point and from what hear the Y2K is going to be a problem for a year after anyway. Most of all I can't see getting married to any stock these days. Hell, there s a lot of guys who won't be married to there wives come 2000.' AH: You move in and start asking your usual questions about rumours and GPW. It looks you don't know anything about the GPW plans for expanding through acquisitions. You are surprised and demand an explanation. Mr .F.: 'Gary, what's this thing about buying up IT companies. Are you starting a rumour? How does this apply to GPW? Are you saying that is what GPW intends to do or what it should do?' You get a shot of information that cannot be questioned. Buying other companies by GPW is NOT a rumour, NOT an illegal insider information, NOT cheerleading, NOT a promotion. It is a company strategy which is a common knowledge to the shareholders of the GPW stock and, I presume, short players. 'Mr. Forthright. For the record, it was stated clearly in the A.G.M. for shareholders, this past Feb., that GPW had done due diligence on 7 potential acquisitions.' All of a sudden, you know everything about the strategy. You are a knowledgeable guy after all. Mr .F.: 'Nathan, I know that the company has as a strategy to make acquisitions.' But it does not stop you from implying that Gary might be a part to a conspiracy group that promotes GPW at the expense of the little guy. Mr .F.: 'Gary be a man and answer my questions. Show the other guys on this thread who you really are and what you really know.' In the meantime, you try to make an impression that there is a group of GPW shareholders that supports your silly postings. The thread is 'full' of them. It sounds that you represent them here. You make again an attempt to divide the thread into cheerleaders and reasonable investors who are happy to see you voice their concerns. Yet, you are not a shareholder and you keep saying that your money is ridding the GPW horse. Mr .F.: 'This thread is full of people that were initially unhappy with me for spoiling a "let's make us all feel good about GPW" party. Now I feel that people realize that a different point a view can probably be constructive. Do you disagree with them?' When confronted, you tend to think that you have a lot of friends on this thread. And you know more than the little guy. On one hand, anything positive or constructive said on this thread is labelled by you as a result of some illegal or self-serving activity, on the other, you keep repeating that you know more than the public. Mr. F.: 'Talk for yourself when you say that I have not contributed anything constructive and I am not worth talking to. Obviously you don't know what goes on behind the scene.' If you want to make people to sell, do a better job. This is too transparent. In my opinion, you just make negative and infantile noises that contribute nothing 'constructive' to this forum. PS. Play the market where it should be played. Buy or sell. Be a man.