Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FTJoe who wrote (6139)	4/26/1998 1:35:00 PM
From: Terry T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

FTJoe, I value your comments/contributions, but I also recall Matty G. raving early on about how intricate and sophisticated the Echomedia website was. Since this is his area of work, and he purports to be CEO of his family's business in this area, I have to believe there is some merit to his early comments (no matter that he later soured on investment because of the uncertainties and questions raised by the Wired articles regarding the identity and character of management). The issue, I thought, re technology, was whether the Sesame Ad technology was viable or not. I have not heard much more about that since last fall, unfortunately. I was presuming Charles Rose was having a hand in that effort, and do not know what happened to that after his role changed to a "strategic alliance" (whatever that means). I still view this company and venture as a project/diamond in the rough. I doubt if it could have afforded SIM business if it were a money machine at the time of the acquisition so I view the purchase of it (with all of its warts and problems) as a "work out" investment requiring some patchwork and tinkering, but still an essential part of the puzzle for turning this company into a viable and competitive internet company. Hope I am right, but who knows for sure.

To: FTJoe who wrote (6139)	4/26/1998 5:16:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

FTJoe, I know throughout that you've been honorable in all of this. You've put up good questions that needed answers. No doubt about it. I only highlighted Mark M's message, where you were quoted, only to show that the company has grown so much since then, but the complaints always seem to exist similarily. We're close to a better understanding of what's all at play here. In the meanwhile, we're moving stable or forward for the most part. This is encouraging. Volume of share interest is still strong and some big things can happen. We're all waiting. From what I've been able to glean, the 39 million in revenues will hold up. The audit can come out horrible. But if this fact stands, I think we'll be in good shape. This is particularly true if all bodes well for the ESVS merger and the private placement succeeds. My view is: Life will be sweet then and my gray hairs will grow on their own, without me helping them.