Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (6578)	4/26/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: Stewart V. Nelson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Barb You are arguing with an "mad man". Furthermore, I think SI should bar comments from anyone that threatens to sue another poster just because they have contrary opinions. I have been threaten in e-mail notes by other maniacal members of this thread and I am fed up with it! Just my opinion. regards Stewart Nelson

To: Mama Bear who wrote (6578)	4/27/1998 5:53:00 AM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

BARBARA J. PAYNE Barb, Your habitual busy bee style of glancing instead of reading is known to me. And your self appointed role to shoe in for Craig is noted. But your posting does not address the issue I raised in my posting. The issue my post touched was not how many followed Craigs opinions, at what price and how much profit they made by following his "opinions". The issue was, that I suggested that he acknowledges that all opinionated statements he posted within that mentioned time frame in my post, are based on his conclusions, reached upon speculation and not on his opinion formed through "due diligence" upon facts. <<<...in your obsessive attack on craig>> What a clownish spike! Shall I send Mr. Craig Crawford who professed in public view that he sells short OSICOM (FIBR) with a vengeance, a THANK YOU VERY MUCH note? ED