To: RWS who wrote (17358 ) 4/26/1998 9:09:00 PM From: Bull RidaH Respond to of 94695
Hi RWS, I reviewed the basis of your current wave count, and realize where we differ is the view of the market action from 3/20 to 4/6. The main reason I was very much on guard for the prior set of impulse waves higher to end on 3/20 was due to 5 levels of impulse waves which were all scheduled to end on that day, and at the 1112 area on the June S&P. I was tracking these waves closely all the way back to the 1/12 beginning of that move, and all my indicators suggests that they did indeed end on 3/20, and the A Wave correction began there. If you review the price action from 3/20 to 4/1, which is where I believe the 5 waves of A ended, do you notice substantial change from the prior weeks? What confirmed it for me was not only the action during that timeframe, but the fact that Vix rose substantially, and the "diamond" reversal pattern formed during that time as well, giving clear signs on where to expect the C Wave down to begin after the B wave higher. I realize that the price action in this time frame was not your typical A wave price action, and the following C wave decline was certainly atypical, as many including myself painfully recall. But the reason for the ultimate "sideways" correction that lasted from 3/20 to 4/16 can be found in Elliott's theory, which I should have placed in the forefront of my mind: The theory of Alternation, which states that if 2nd wave corrections are sharp, then the 4th wave correction is usually sideways, and vice-versa. The 2nd wave correction that lasted from Dec. 8th '97 to Jan. 12th '98 was extremely sharp, taking the SPX from the 980's to the 912 area. Thus, what should I have been expecting for the wave 4 correction that I firmly believe completed on 4/16? Sideways!! The reason my opinion was for substantially lower prices was due to the size of the unretraced move from Jan.12th to March 20th, plus the size of the patterns that had formed that would have propelled prices sharply lower had they been activated (by breaking 1105, the infamous neckline of the head & shoulders pattern). In retrospect, I should have expected that area to hold based on the theory of alternation, and refrained from position agressively for a down move until it did. Won't make that mistake again. Even in my scenario, you're fine holding puts through Wednesday, but I'd be vigilantly looking for bottoming action in that timeframe, especially if 1100 is not taken out by then. Best Wishes, David