SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jr shorty who wrote (31867)4/27/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: go4it  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
<<but it is the persistant ignorance of the loyal followers that allow this to perpetuate.>>

What a crock of bull if I ever heard one. For the last year and a half I have been posting why I felt IPM would be a winner allowing people to show me the error of my ways. I have debated and fought and appreciate the input that the people I have fought with had but you come on here touting this garbage like you have been here all along. Have you been here all along under a different name? By your thinking a person should only believe in something that is going well and dump anything in life that isn't. It is obvious now that management screwed up big time but that is life in the business world. Good luck to you jr.



To: jr shorty who wrote (31867)4/27/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Respond to of 35569
 
JS,
Weather or not IPM mined the public is still open to debate, and people are entitled to their opinions. However, actions that are bitter, rude, and small, are uncalled for under either scenario.

Taking glee in someone elses misfortune is uncalled for and unecessary.

Mark


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News