Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crossy who wrote (594)	4/27/1998 6:49:00 PM
From: Jim B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

THankyou.. someone on the CSHK thread said to me, "Jim, call the company and get some answers Prove to us that these things are true or not true"... that is not a direct quote.. but close as I can remember.. anyway I told them that I had done ENOUGH DD on CSHK to justify my investment... when I feel I have enough DD I buy if I like it... I'm accountable to no one but myself. Those people trying to get me to hype or say things that are just untrue; how stupid do they think we are. Anyway I agree with you that I think CSHK has alot of potential IF they can get some things taken care of (including stopping the crap on the CSHK thread). I talked w/ the company today and I get the feeling that they will soon have an IR firm to better handle investors and that is part of the reason for some of this chaos. The company has just been too busy to answer so many questions and has been busy focusing on putting together a final contract between CSHK and Merced the company that makes software products.. y2k software, but NOT just y2k.. they have other things too... I also like TSIS and CITN which are a bit more stable but they will take longer to appreciate imo. jim