Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt Brown who wrote (4242)	4/27/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Respond to of 6654

"No gut for loosing" answer me this, Matt when is the last time you lost in excess of $20k in less than 2 1/2 hours? After investing in a company over the course of months based on the information being provided by the company. AOL is the worst place to try and get info, I've read those AOL boards and chat rooms and have never really gained alot of DD off them. Those guys that have wrote down less than a 1k loss arent doing anything but talking and hoping someone intiates legal action so they can "free ride" it. Personally I wouldnt pay much attention to them. But hey anything can happen... I dont plan on suing anyone if CVIA tries to set things right, the others can do whatever they want sue buy sell panic ect ect... thats their problem <g> The lawyers have the contact list so even if I dont go through with it,,, the lawyer can still contact the other people on that list. But they get to foot the $6k bill. KAA

To: Matt Brown who wrote (4242)	4/27/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: Popiye	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6654

FATT MATT: The companies are more worried about investors shorting the stock for principles of their word. Many of the longs here have not departed and expect the word to carried through that the shareholders were promised - plan and simple:)

To: Matt Brown who wrote (4242)	4/27/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 6654

Matt- I have heard instances of former shareholders suing when bad news, which caused the panic selling, is reversed after they sold out and the price rebounds. I'm not a securities attorney but I think their rationale would follow along these lines. Company issues news that they know, or should have known, will tank the stock. Shareholders bail out, the stock tanks, company then REVERSES itself, does the right thing and the stock rebounds. The disgruntled shareholders feel damaged because they believe their shares were extorted by the company who "planned" this all along to get shares on the cheap. It may sound ridiculous, but these things do happen. TG