Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tom pope who wrote (8594)	4/27/1998 8:35:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

Tom Pope I always use APM as an example when someone says shorts are good for the longs.... made alot of money on APM...and lost it. Susan..no help from me...I am just about as bad ;-)))))

To: tom pope who wrote (8594)	4/28/1998 2:17:00 AM
From: BoNg-N-BoNg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

off topic..>>> AT and I are veterans (victims) of the great short squeeze that didn't happen - APM, last fall.<<< Hey Tom, you forgot me, I'm the 3rd musketeers on APM...One "great" prediction AT did after the fall of APM is predicting that they will go down at their book value of around $8 that time... AT almost hit that target!! on message #8597 >>I think he means that APM doesn't give good heads.<< LOL.. it took me awhile to get that!! Talking about heads, I think ReadRite is much better..Anyway, I'm pretty sure that APM's yield will improve next year..LOL ..I have more things on my mind to say but it will TOS me out of SI... just me.. eL...