Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: andrew r harwood who wrote (1899)	4/27/1998 8:28:00 PM
From: Chuck Rubin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3335

Do you have an investment in this play? If so, you are typical of a disenchanted player that should sight his interests elsewhere. If you think this spec is so dark and dire...how come you are still here hoping others will harvest your sour grapes???????????? Happy (other) trails Chuckr

To: andrew r harwood who wrote (1899)	4/28/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Scott Cameron	Respond to of 3335

Do you have anything specific to suggest that hole #2 was a clunker?......I sure hope not.......I too am nervous with not only the silence on hole #2 lab results but also the fact that the ongoing urgent IR message (just before run-ups) --"last chance to get on board!!"--, is always turning out to mean 'hurry up and wait'!! Why put the word out that lab results will be out by the end of March with a major deal the 1st week of April and not have an official explanation for the delays. When this kind of thing happens too often then the more cynical types in the crowd start to think..."Pump and Dump" and that doesn't do anything for the market credibility of the stock! As investors, if the news is bad then don't we have a right to be informed on a timely basis? Forgive me if I sound cranky.......I love this story but there sure seem to be alot of banana peels out there for us John(Joan) Q investors. Cheers