Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (8610)	4/27/1998 10:05:00 PM
From: Susan Saline	Respond to of 120523

>>>>(many people thought that the Fed was trying to jawbone down the market with that article this morning...on purpose...a supposed leak..you know) Lisa, I tend to agree. Mucho market manipulation! Sue

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (8610)	4/27/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: Pierre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

LS - the following is from WSJ. Are you saying that is misreported, or old news, or timed to create spin? I'm not questioning your assessment, just trying to learn how to read WSJ between the lines. TIA. Pierre In a sign of concern, Fed policy makers agreed at their March 31 meeting that a rate increase is more likely than a decrease. In doing so,they abandoned the neutral stance that was adopted in December to demonstrate, as the Fed put it, that they might cut rates if "the turmoil in Asia were to intensify."