Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Big Dog who wrote (1223)	4/27/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7491

Rover, here you go pal. It's FTR (for the public record in case you need help). You can dessiminate this to the proper authorities: I have no financial interest in seeing Cashco go up or down. I have no financial interest in any company that would benefit from Cashco going up or down. In addition, my investments, stock or otherwise, are in completely unrelated sectors. I have no business dealings with any company who would benefit from seeing Cashco go up or down. I have no acquaintances, friends, associates, or relatives who would benefit from Cashco going up or down. To qualify that, I could not possibly know what is in all of their portfolios, but through various communications, I conclude with reasonable cause that they have no financial interests in the matter. Strictly speaking, both sides weren't presented on the thread, in my opinion--the postive was overly enhanced, the negative was being unfairly suppressed. I felt morally obligated to give investors an opportunity to observe aspects of the company which--although they are public record in other areas of the internet--they were not being presented on the thread nor could they be easily found. I have a knowledge of the net that is a bit further ahead than many of the common public. I felt it proper to use this to look deeper and present the findings for the benefit of investors. Additionally, although I do not hold any Y2K stocks at this writing, I have an interest in the industry because of its potential public impact. I feel that some companies have "cashed in" on this current popularity, yet are not really engaged in the industry to the best interests of investors. I feel that some newsletters actively "shill" this material. I feel that some of those shills post on SI. I feel it is potentially harmful to investors. I dislike seeing investors getting "taken in" by con artists. The website, FBN Associates, is a parody which satirically demonstrates many aspects of these "scam" companys. That's where it's "at" and it's verifiable. Woof Woof, buddy.