Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (14703)	4/28/1998 2:10:00 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

That is your truth, James, based on your interpretation of the Bible. Many Christian churches have come to a different understanding about homosexuals, and a different interpretation of the Bible based on new understandings of Leviticus, etc. Certainly you are entitled to your own beliefs, but it is false to assume that God did not make man to lie with man, or woman with woman. Not only does Jesus not mention homosexuality in the Bible, but the animal kingdom is absolutely full of homosexual and bisexual animals.

To: Jamey who wrote (14703)	4/28/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Respond to of 39621

James <<There is none higher that we can go to for the truth. The truth is that God did not make man to lie with man or woman with woman.>> Again, with all due respect, What you are saying is only your opinion. It is not a fact, and many people feel differently. James, you may feel free to literally translate the Bible, that is your right and privelege. You do have to remember that not everyone feels that the Bible can be literally translated. Not even all Christians feel that way, not to mention the rest of the world. Just as you have a right to literal translation, we have a right to non-literal translation. Mark