Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 9:38:00 AM
From: jhild	Respond to of 7491

Well actually, the questions haven't been answered. Your saying they are doesn't make it so.

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: David Lawrence	Respond to of 7491

>>...coincidence that within 24hours of CSHK's lawyer have a memo posted here that these people could be charged with libel? Jim, I've read practically every message posted on this thread in the past few days. I'll venture an opinion that any lawyer (and client) stupid enough to bring such charges would find themselves on the defensive by facing sanctions for filing such frivolous charges. However, I could see government charges arise if, repeat, if it turns out that any of the active participants to the recent discussion promoting this stock are financially or legally related to the company. Just one man's opinion. Regards, David

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 9:52:00 AM
From: CatLady	Respond to of 7491

Actually, I have more open questions than before.

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 7491

Here is my fear Jim B. At least acknowledge the deductive reasoning and thought process. My wish is that cshk is legit....I OWN SHARES REMEMBER! I have spoken about how companies buy up defunct businesses just to have access to the shares that had been authorized to sell by the SEC. This happens all the time. Take for example an out of business company was authorized to sell 10 million shares when they were in business. Now the company is out of biz and the shares can be bought for say .009. That means out of pocket a person (company) could buy them up for $90,000.00. It may sound like a lot of money to you but step back and think for just a minute. A couple of releases that imply that the company could turn a dime profit (not promises) just implications with no guarantee and you have a runner. .10 x a 20 p/e and this stock should have a value of $2.00 per share. This coupled with some Internet hype and some unethical promoters (who get paid in shares for their efforts) and the stock goes from .009 to .50. Then the people who purchased can't understand why the stock languishes and doesn't move higher on news. The reason is that the same people who promoted are selling hard and shorting. Yes I said shorting. I misconception is that stocks under $5.00 can't be shorted-not true! For the average person this is the case but not for Market makers and people with deep pockets. So they make money up or down. The only thing that matters is have a large enough share base to work from to make it profitable. As an investor, if you don't time your trades perfectly (a tactic that is unsuccessful ) you lose money. I hope just like you that cshk is legit, but I have some doubts. If you were sitting in my office right now I know I could articulate this concept and you would walk away thinking a whole new way about the market. The only reason I own this stock is because there was a technical "buy" based on volume. You may not always like my posts but I don't hype and I am not a stupid man. I have seen this happen for years. I know it well

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 10:08:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 7491

..coincidence that within 24hours of CSHK's lawyer have a memo posted here that these people could be charged with libel? Yup. Just coincidence. We're well aware we wrote nothing libelous. (Actually silly Rebecca mentioned "slander", you'll recall; a mistake.) I think I explained pretty clearly why I'm leaving: no point endlessly repeating oneself. The material's on the table. Those who get it, have already got it; those who don't never will. But naturally I'll be lurking, and will of course comment on anything that seems of particular interest. Hasta la vista!

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 10:13:00 AM
From: John Chapman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

While it is quiet it is a good time to remind us that the software is real and works. See messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com. It is an April 7 post that says:I downloaded the beta file at waltech.com/~scott, and it worked perfectly for me! It appears to be all and more that Cashco has claimed. It was only a 6.4 meg file and installed easily with winzip. The scott site was closed soon afterward to people getting an advanced peek so do not get all excited when you go there and need a UN and PW.

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 10:13:00 AM
From: Henster	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7491

Jim B, can you point me to the post from CHSK's attorney. There are just to many garbage posts to wade through in order for me to find it. Thank You, Phil Henn

To: Jim B who wrote (1289)	4/28/1998 10:21:00 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

I guess I must re-post yo get a response from you JIM. Here is my fear Jim B. At least acknowledge the deductive reasoning and thought process. My wish is that cshk is legit....I OWN SHARES REMEMBER! I have spoken about how companies buy up defunct businesses just to have access to the shares that had been authorized to sell by the SEC. This happens all the time. Take for example an out of business company was authorized to sell 10 million shares when they were in business. Now the company is out of biz and the shares can be bought for say .009. That means out of pocket a person (company) could buy them up for $90,000.00. It may sound like a lot of money to you but step back and think for just a minute. A couple of releases that imply that the company could turn a dime profit (not promises) just implications with no guarantee and you have a runner. .10 x a 20 p/e and this stock should have a value of $2.00 per share. This coupled with some Internet hype and some unethical promoters (who get paid in shares for their efforts) and the stock goes from .009 to .50. Then the people who purchased can't understand why the stock languishes and doesn't move higher on news. The reason is that the same people who promoted are selling hard and shorting. Yes I said shorting. I misconception is that stocks under $5.00 can't be shorted-not true! For the average person this is the case but not for Market makers and people with deep pockets. So they make money up or down. The only thing that matters is have a large enough share base to work from to make it profitable. As an investor, if you don't time your trades perfectly (a tactic that is unsuccessful ) you lose money. I hope just like you that cshk is legit, but I have some doubts. If you were sitting in my office right now I know I could articulate this concept and you would walk away thinking a whole new way about the market. The only reason I own this stock is because there was a technical "buy" based on volume. You may not always like my posts but I don't hype and I am not a stupid man. I have seen this happen for years. I know it well