SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DIGITCOM (DGIV-OTC-bb)Information Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Ulysses who wrote (77)4/28/1998 10:55:00 AM
From: macker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 530
 
this is one of the ideas i was trying to convey here in prior posts, leasing lines is not the only way to go. also, if you look at the entire release and disseminate it, it shows that dgiv is definitely mulit-media.

macker



To: Michael Ulysses who wrote (77)4/28/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 530
 
Michael,

If I may, I'd like to clarify one of the definitions on the preceding list. Nothing personal here, but one of the explanations may be throwing some people off:

>>>A POP necessarily has a unique Internet (IP) address. Your
independent service provider (ISP) or online service provider (OSP) has a point-of-presence on the Internet. POPs are sometimes used as one measure of the size and growth of an ISP or OSP.<<<

You are apparently, IMO, combining two different and distinct meanings of the same three-letter combination: POP. One POP is an acronym and the other POP is an abbreviation.

"POP," or Point of Presence, as it relates to an ISP's (or any other telecomm-related variant's) housing and mounting of hardware in a central office or similar dwelling, does not require, necessarily, an IP address, as pointed out. Maybe it requires a postal address and a z...IP Code, but not an IP address.

A POP is merely a structure or quarters in which a service provider resides, located in their geographic serving area, normally, that houses telecommunications switching, transmission and routing equipment, and other facilities-related essentials (see below under colocation). In effect, inmost instances, it could also be called one of their nodes.

I suppose one could assume some license here, if they were referring to a newly coined term that connotes a "virtual" POP, which would require, perhaps, IP addresses, but I don't think that was the intent. Unless I'm mistaken, of course, in which case I'm happy to retract my observation and criticism, in advance.

Colocation (which I think was somehow intended to be explained here or somewhere else on the boards today) is a slightly different take on the same theme. An ISP (or any other form of carrier) "colo's" when they cut a deal with an incumbent tenant or owner of a POP (because they don't have one of their own... with the same set of conveniences). The intent is to rent, and often 'share,' some of the space and other facilities management essentials, such as:

racks to mount their own equipment,
cabling and labor associated with POP inside wiring,
direct access to sub cables and pairs (big money saver),
direct access to LD facilities and peering links(likewise),
access to the incumbent's router and switch ports (partitions),
joint use of operations support systems (OSSs),
fire protection, electric power, air conditioning (HVAC),
access to accounting & billing systems (back office)
physical and logical security,
backup generation and fuel supply,
amenities like mail room and janitorial services,
office automation services in some cases,
etc.

OTOH, the "POP" that is used to measure a carrier's size (or, more to the point, the potential subscriber base size of a particular market) is a different adaptation of the word. In this sense it is a contraction or abbreviated form of the word "p_o_p_ulation" and it refers to the head count in, or a given set of, market demographics. Cellular and PCS carriers, and sometimes ISPs, Cable Cos and others, use the term "POP" in this context. 743,029 POPs in the County of ... It's similar to the metric "homes passed" used to describe the extent to which a carrier has wired a neighborhood, or region, only "POPs" refers to folks, not buildings.

HTH, and Regards, Frank Coluccio



To: Michael Ulysses who wrote (77)7/21/1998 4:43:00 PM
From: Michael Ulysses  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 530
 
Is Fax Over IP Dead?

CHERRY HILL, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 21, 1998--Is Fax over IP (FoIP) Dead? No,of course not. In fact, its growth has only just begun. Want proof? Look at the fax industry's recent headlines..

Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT - news) licenses IP Fax technology and invests in Open Port Technology (Chicago)..

Natural MicroSystems (NASDAQ: NMSS - news) launches its NaturalFax/AG product line for IP Fax..

FaxSav (NASDAQ: FAXX - news) reports annual revenues have grown by 575% since 1993..

LAN & Enterprise fax server pioneer RightFax, subsidiary of Applied Voice Technology (NASDAQ: AVTC - news)

IP Fax enables its entire product line.. Dialogic Corp (NASDAQ: DLGC - news) announces DM/F240 & DM/F300 high density, intelligent fax boards designed for IP Fax service bureaus and next generation telcos..

GTE (NYSE: GTE - news) and ICG Netcom (NASDAQ: ICGX - news) choose NetCentric's (Cambridge) FaxStorm as technology backbone of their IP Fax services..

Brooktrout Technology (NASDAQ: BRKT - news) unable to keep up with IP Fax board demand enters two-tier distribution. Castelle (NASDAQ: CSTL - news) announces new IP inbound fax routing technique and major upgrades..

According to Maury Kauffman, managing partner of The Kauffman Group, an enhanced fax technology and services analyst and consulting firm: ''The fundamental problem stalling the widespread growth and migration of fax traffic from the PSTN to IP is not technological,
it's a sales and marketing issue. ISPs and Next Gen Telcos have not yet learned how to do, what fax service bureaus have been doing for nearly ten years; successfully sell fax services. Until they do learn, only three groups will benefit from the shift to Fax over IP: 1)corporations installing FoIP on their Intranet or VPN, will save money;
2) enhanced fax service bureaus, who already profit and 3) hardware and software companies that sell to both.''

Kauffman concludes. ''However, whether ISPs ever get it or not, make no mistake, fax traffic is migrating to IP and the rewards will be huge.''

Maury Kauffman is author of the Bible of the global fax industry: Internet and Computer Based Faxing, The Complete Guide to Understanding and Building IP and G3 Fax Applications. 460 pages, including 38 chapters, a glossary, and index, the book is a complete reference guide to PSTN and IP fax technology and the fax industry.

It is considered a ''must read'' for anyone needing to understand how fax works or who are the leaders of the fax industry. ISPs, Next Generation Telcos, and anyone wanting to build or sell fax services should begin here.

Internet and Computer Based Faxing is available for $34.95 US. To order, call: 1-800-LIBRARY or outside of the US: 212/691-8215, or fax 408/848-5784, or email telecom@rushorder.com

Kauffman will speak about the migration of fax to IP, the latest developments in the fax industry and other fax related issues at:

Fax Directions '98, Aug 2-4, San Diego (520-751-1896)
Telecom Business '98, Sept 1-3, New York City
RightFax Worldwide Partner Summit, Sept 9-11, Tucson, AZ
Pulver.Com's Voice on the Net (VON) Fall '98, Sept 14-17,
Washington, DC
Computer Telephony Demo Expo '98, Sept 23-25, New York City
Internet World Fall 98, October 5-9, New York City

Maury Kauffman is managing partner of The Kauffman Group
(http://www.KauffmanGroup.com) an enhanced fax technology and services analyst and consulting firm. He is the ''Life In The Fax Lane'' columnist for Computer Telephony magazine and has written for over 30 other publications.

Kauffman is a perennial speaker at technology and communications conferences on three continents. His clients include: AT&T, Brooktrout, Dialogic, IBM, Sprint, US West and more than a dozen of the fax industry's most successful companies.

Maury Kauffman can be reached at: 609-482-8288, fax: 609-482-8940 or
maury@kauffmangroup.com or contact Virginia Simon, PMI at: 610-270-0172

Notes: Editors wanting a review copy of Internet and Computer Based Faxing should contact Christine Kern at Telecom Books: christin@nyoffice.mhs.compuserve.com or:
212-691-8215. All companies listed are trademarks of their respective companies.

Contact:

The Kauffman Group
Maury Kauffman, 609/482-8288, fax: 609/482-8940
maury@kauffmangroup.com
or
PMI
Virginia Simon, 610/270-0172