Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M2 who wrote (27768)	4/28/1998 3:14:00 PM
From: John Dally	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike & Will, Here's a good look at IBM's cash flows: ibm.com What's interesting is that even though IBM is moving toward services, it's "Payments for plant, rental machines and other property" increase by $2 billion, or 45% (!), between 1995 and 1997. This could also explain why their tax rate is decreasing. If for the purpose of WS they are choosing to capitalize expenses (which makes their earnings look better), while for the purpose of the IRS they are choosing to expense the same items, then the tax rate on reported earnings would decline. Also, note that if you take "Net cash provided from operating activities," less "Payments for plant, rental machines and other property," plus "Proceeds from disposition of plant, rental machines and other property," you get cash flows of $7.6 billion in 1995, $5.7 billion in 1996, and $3.3 billion in 1997: a drop of $4.3 billion, or 57% (!), over the last 2 years! Now, I haven't really been following IBM, other than cursing its high stock price, but since you are a couple of razor sharp Siamese twins, you should be able to get to the bottom of this twice as fast! Best regards, John.

To: Mike M2 who wrote (27768)	4/28/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

Mike, Terrific article. Now if schlubs like us and the guy from The New York Post can see the scam, what the heck are the analysts doing? Well, we know, but it's still kind of sad. The main thing I hate is to see this CEO treated like a savior while his predecessors are skewered as dopes. I don't think he has done anything to improve IBM's business position that isn't related to scams that made the price of the stock go up. Seeing somebody get rich by scamming, especially in an unsophisticated, in your face sort of way, bugs me that it's not me. <G> MB