Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3572)	4/28/1998 9:49:00 PM
From: bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

You have a smart ass mouth little man. I hope you never have to back it up. I'll Dorothy of Kansas any day. She only has one face, Mr. Simple Hyper!

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3572)	4/29/1998 8:23:00 AM
From: M. M. Jones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

" Tell me why your revelations came at the breakout from the cup and handle formation on the chart? The shorters had to stop the buying or they were going to be squeezed. The c&p is a very bullish formation and it was right at the critical breakout point when you came along." This is a joke! This is the comment of a manipulator. To hell with the truth! If the cup and handle formation is right, and we are about to have a short squeeze -- where a WHOLE LOT of innocent investors will be suckered into buying -- then the simple truth about the company should be suppressed until a few "investors" are able to take their profits and run. Is that the way you operate Bob? "Was that just an accident?" Yes, that is exactly what I said: it was a coincidence -- an accident in your terminology. But my behavior would have been the same even if I had known about the cup and handle formation. Unless the chart refers to facts in the real world, it is worthless long term and damaging to the ignorant. "Were you just stupidly helping the people who were trying to make your investment worth nothing? If you were an investor and believed what you say you found out why haven't you sold?" Your convoluted imaginings have nothing to recommend them. The truth is preferable to vain plots to outmaneuver short sellers who may or may not exist. What is the exit point you are aiming for, Bob -- 49›? Why should I lie to help you in this? M.M.

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (3572)	4/29/1998 12:25:00 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4736

jerks on this thread who have been trying to destroy my investment for the last nine months Kiss my ass Bob. Tell me why your revelations came at the breakout from the cup and handle formation on the chart? First of all... My 'revelations' came after NAMX made the false claim that GRUY had evaluated a site, and after I talked to Gruy. It had nothing to do with and T/A. Secondly: Who told you that NAMX was in a cup and handle formation anyway?? it was right at the critical breakout point when you came along Excuse me, but I 'came along' way way way WAY WAY before you did, not just a couple months ago. If you were an investor and believed what you say you found out why haven't you sold? Because I don't have enough shares for it to really be worth anything for me. The Gruy report should be done by now. What is the hold up? You asked the question, not me. How is this supposed to prove I am a 'gremlin'? All it does is support the fact that I uncovered a couple months ago. I don't know the answer. I will say it again. You are either an inside player, Bob. Or you are paranoid. Thats right! You've figured it out!! We've all got you surrounded bub! Me, Molly, Hunter, bob, Soros, all of us! We've circled the wagons around you to try to peel your 8000 shares out of your hands ... boy when we do that it shoudl KILL the NMAX price!!! James