Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kansas George who wrote (53795)	4/28/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: HardMoney	Respond to of 58324

*************************************************************** Rockys' IOM vendetta, posted on syquest thread 6244, " I don't give a rat's ass if this company makes money or not. I am not invested in it. But every sale that Syquest makes is another potential Iomega sale down the drain." ***************************************************************** Rocky you are truly sick or truly scum since you supposedly covered your IOM short.....you're not invested in it(IOM) either......fool!!!! Frank

To: Kansas George who wrote (53795)	4/29/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: FuzzFace	Respond to of 58324

Rocky's vendetta against IOM is known to all regulars here, but I was surprised he let it slip out in the way he did, especially after all his recent protestations that he's just trying to save poor unsuspecting investors from making a mistake. All that is once again exposed for what it is: a smokescreen for his monomaniacal hatred for a stock that has dared to lose his money. On a human level, the whole thing is really very sad. But on an investment level, the real problem with Rocky is he is just noise, the noise never stops, and it tends to crowd out real information needed to wisely play a stock's ups and downs. So for those that forgot or never knew, here is day one of Rocky's anti-IOM monomania: techstocks.com