To: Bradpalm1 who wrote (3638 ) 4/29/1998 9:15:00 AM From: Dauntless Respond to of 7041
Bradpalm1 - "eloquent & compelling retort indeed" Let's look at a recent epistle of yours: <<<Don't be disturbed by Dauntless, he's simply a talking head for Zonagen. His convictions, words and distortions are those of the company he shills for. Why waste your time crossing swords with the Zonagen hierarchy? They'll have plenty to worry about soon enough.>>> If not an eight-year-old's response, maybe a ten-year-old's. How about if you go back and find a representative sample of my posts that backup your claim as to my "convictions, words and distortions". I don't work for Zonagen, I have been defending some friends against the completely false accusations of Asensio - parroted ad nauseam by Wexler and others. If you can prove your claims about me, please do so. Otherwise, please do not make me the object of your posts. Also, if you have something to say to me, do it directly. Your position as a Pfizer fan has been obvious for some time. What's interesting is that your posts here and on the Vivus thread seem to indicate that you feel this is a winner take all game - with that degree of market savvy, perhaps we should believe that you ARE an M.D. (no offense to Myron, Cacaito and others). Please let us know what the dropout rate is for the Vasomax Phase III trials? Do you have an accurate tabulation of WHY those that dropped out chose to do so? Also, can you tell us where you get your data - SGP, Zonagen or Pharmaco? Who else would have accurate and complete statistics? If the company is claiming 30%-40% efficacy for patients with mild to moderate ED (about 80% of market falls in theses two categories), then dropout rates of 60%-70+% would be expected, no? Is your "data" showing a higher percentage of dropouts than that?