SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Time Traveler who wrote (5853)4/29/1998 6:59:00 AM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6843
 
Time Traveller:

<<For your super-conductor library, you do not have to achieve zero resistance at absolute zero. Although the DC resistance goes to zero at the super-conducting temperature and material, does the AC resistance also go to zero as well?>>

For superconducting material below Tc, the DC resistance is 0. The AC resistance becomes significant above a certain frequency. For Niobium where the Tc=9K the AC resistance becomes significant above a frequency of a few hundred of gigahertz. As a rule of thumb the superconductor becomes a lousy conductor at frequency above its Josephson frequency. For Niobium is 600GHz and for YBCO (ceramic superconductor of Tc=92K) it is about 2000GHz or 2THz.

Maxwell



To: Time Traveler who wrote (5853)4/29/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6843
 
Time Traveler, re:<your assertion that a+b=a>

Your original statement was
Junction resistance + trace resistance = junction resistance.
found in post 5844.

I was merely pointing out that this is true only if b (a.k.a. trace resistance) = 0. This is certainly true at 0 degK, but not for any practical device. Furthermore you seem unfamiliar with engineering jargon, to wit:

Although the DC resistance goes to zero at the super-conducting temperature and material, does the AC resistance also go to zero as well?

The proper term for "AC resistance" is impedance.

I mention Ohm's law only because you should travel back in time to 1827, when it was discovered rather than wasting your time here.

Petz