SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nanda who wrote (11269)4/29/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 13949
 
Re: Will anybody buy Y2K tools again?

Here are a few interesting Y2K stats on that subject, from a recent survey by Cap Gemini of Fortune 500 companies:

95% of the companies said they had already bought Y2K tools to fix the problem, yet only 60% had a full-fledged strategy in place. So, it doesn't seem like the tool market has much of a market remaining, unless small business is not in step with big business.

A surprising fact was that outsourcing plans decreased from 87% to 66% over the last year. Since the speaker's interpretation was that companies realize they don't have time to outsource, I am presuming they mean from the assessment side of things where a company like Keane comes in to draw up a big plan. In other words, I think this statistic will actually be positive news to the factory remediation vendors who will probably get the work-- again, to save time.

In fact, another statistic was that 80% of the programmers surveyed said Y2K work was boring (i.e. gave it 1 or 2 points out of 5). Even worse, Cap Gemini found that even the best programmers working on familiar code have an error rate of 15%. I also asked if any studies had been done on the code coming back from Indian body shops and Cap Gemini determined that, again, a 15% error rate-- and, it took 2-3 cycles (code going from vendor to company) before all the problems were resolved. Considering they also found 50% of companies do not plan to test their code because they don't have time, and considering that 37% of companies have already had a Y2K related failure, I think we're all in a bit of trouble in the near term. :=0

Press release:
usa.capgemini.com

Note: I requested a full copy of the survey. If I see it posted on the web I will link to it. Otherwise, when I get my copy I will see if I can further elaborate on my notes.

- Jeff



To: Nanda who wrote (11269)4/29/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: Senor VS  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
Sub: MMWW..

Hi Nanda/JDN

Thanks for your informative posts.

What do you think of MMWW(Metamor Worldwide)?.They were earlier known
as CSTF(Corestaff). MMWW has Y2K business with Indian operations
and they have more than $1 Billion of revenue. I think MMWW
is poised for big growth in the next few years and their fundamentals
looks good.

Best Regards
Ravi Narayana