Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FuzzFace who wrote (53833)	4/29/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 58324

Edwin and all, interesting but not very active thread "Paid Touts and Shills Who Post to SI" and "Companies Whose Management Post to SI"; exchange2000.com : +marcos Monday, Dec 8 1997 4:52AM ET Reply # of 1201 Very interesting about the SEC considering SI posting "public disclosure", it's logical and imho inevitable but a bit surprising that they recognize it so quickly? " I'm not in favor of allowing company people, IR people or other paid hypists to post on the regular threads..." Jeffrey, I see a major distinction between direct overt company presence here, imho a Good Thing to be encouraged, and covert paid touting, imho a Despicable Thing, a cause for derision. That's why I started up this thread, "Companies Whose Management Post to SI"; exchange2000.com ....and this one, "Paid Touts and Shills Who Post to SI" -g-; exchange2000.com