SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Christine Traut who wrote (11280)4/29/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
you are speaking to a dinasaur..I was one of those assembler programmers on mainframes...all the systems I worked on didn't fudge
the date...(I guess IBM etc didn't need to scrimp on storage..I worked
on state of the art as my introduction..which now probably looks silly compared to new pcs)
anyway I have called a couple of friends of mine who know people who
worked in early sixties to see if they ever heard about code 99..
I am beginning to think gold bullion,silver etc might be interesting
to watch rather than the gold or silver stocks even..
also I searched the web to see if I could see any reference to the term and couldn't find any..
if you hear anything please post back..if I find out anything more..
will immediately post..hopefully it is not Year1999 problem..
bobby



To: Christine Traut who wrote (11280)4/29/1998 6:53:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin  Respond to of 13949
 
noticed a bigger spread on agcr..agiss..don't know if you are following it..who knows..maybe it will start moving shortly..
look at chart if you get a chance
bobby



To: Christine Traut who wrote (11280)4/30/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
The great unknown works in mysterious ways..today ran into a former
operator of mainframes from as early as the late sixties..I asked him
how they shut down computers for maintenance and repair..he tried to
remember and to the best of his recollection he said that they would
feed in a huge deck of cards and would get a huge sort program as a
result...sounds like a program closed the systems very very carefully..(remember those card decks..a lot of us would punch up our own cards and get lazy about entering sequence numbers..scarey at the thought of dropping all those cards..but laziness would often win out)
think I found the answer to code 99..will check a bit further..but
I think that was one false alarm..
bobby