SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Personal Contingency Planning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anton Wilson who wrote (231)4/29/1998 9:15:00 PM
From: Todd J.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 888
 
Ed Yourdon is editor of AMERICAN PROGRAMMER and one of
the world's leading authorities on software development, author of 25
books on programming, developer of software methodologies used by
thousands of companies around the world. Mr. Yourdon made these
comments in defense when a skeptic claimed his latest book, TIME
BOMB 2000, was all hype:

"...maybe the international banking system will survive, but when
Alan Greenspan says Y2K could be a serious problem (as he did
today, in his testimony to the Senate) you'd better pay attention.
From my perspective, this is not a theoretical, academic issue: this
affects my retirement savings and it's not something I feel like
risking. Bottom line: the banking system, as we currently know it,
is in serious danger of collapsing."
"I can't claim that my crystal ball is perfect, but I will tell you
that my own personal Y2K plans include a very simple
assumption: the government of the U.S., as we currently know it,
will fall on 1/1/2000. Period.
"If Y2K does turn out to be as bad as I think it will be, nobody is
going to care about the opinions of software professionals on
1/1/2000 (other than possibly lynching them for having created the
problem in the first place!); instead, everyone is going to be
concentrating on how to get food, shelter, clothing, and the basic
necessities of life. Y2K threatens all of this, except in the
backwards economies that have never depended on automation or
socio-economic interactions with other automated societies. Rural
China will probably be okay; but in my humble opinion, New
York, Chicago, Atlanta and a dozen other cities are going to
resemble Beirut in January 2000. That's why I've moved out of
NYC to rural New Mexico a couple months ago."



To: Anton Wilson who wrote (231)4/29/1998 11:59:00 PM
From: jwk  Respond to of 888
 
AW -- just wanted to second the thoughts you expressed and add an update on the DIA story I posted the other day.

First, I just meant that to be one indicator of how people might react to y2k induced glitches if and when they find themselves stranded in some form of public conveyance.

Second, remember at DIA the only problem was with one part on one train car. That caused a whole series of other problems including the need to empty an entire concourse ( they're huge) because one bus driver dropped off one load of passengers at the wrong door. People who were stuck in a dark, unventilated tunnel for over an hour, who had waited in lines for buses for over an hour, who had missed their flights and made it on to another flight, were kept sitting on a plane for over on hour and then returned to the terminal where they had to de-plane, wait for another bus, and go through the cycle again.

POINT OF THIS IS: the only initial problem was one bad wheel on one train car. Everthing else casdaded down from it...... AND the whole rest of the infastructure was working fine.

You gotta ask: What if the initial *glitch* had been a bit more wide spread? What if the level of infastructure support had been lss because of other situations? What if it hadn't been a nice warm and pleasent spring afternoon ( say perhaps, oh I don't know ...... early January?)?

Also, the Denver media has been filled the last two days with stories about the whitewash of the situation. The conditions in the trains were much worse than reported. They are very lucky that there were no serious injuries or worse.

Final two comments: DIA showed us that one small problem can bring on a whole series of bigger problems very quickly, AND no matter what the amount or level of the problems are, the key factor is how the people affected respond to them. Just a few people having *difficulty*dealing with a situation can make the whole thing a lot worse for everyone very quickly.

DIA was an ice cube. Y2K could be an ice berg. No problem though 'cause this thing can't sink ..... I mean we'rebusy and important people. We don't have time to have our lives inconvenienced like that.