Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BILL L who wrote (1158)	4/29/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: KMFDM2000	Respond to of 8242

Bill, The pullback today had NOTHING to do about the stock running out of steam...YOUR WRONG!!!!....There were over 100,000 more shares bought than sold. The MMs playing games...JUST WAIT... Best Regards, Zak KMFDM2000

To: BILL L who wrote (1158)	4/29/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: wmj	Respond to of 8242

This correction was necessary. It is easier and easier to see who the day traders are based on this terrible panic over a 16% correction. If you sold, great for you, so long...stop bad mouthing a great company. If you held (like I did) while the panic-stricken day traders fled, remember why you bought PNLK to begin with. Nothing has fundamentally changed. Look what happened to DGIV when it got ahead of itself (several times)...a classic pullback followed by accumulation and a follow-on surge in the stock price. Any TA would have indicated this was going to happen. And yes, it IS good for the long term investment prospects for PNLK, we can now begin to establish a stronger support base around $4. If you think we are going to stay under $4 for long, keep dreaming. We had a pretty quick (30-minute) correction with relatively low volume. I'm buying more shares from the whiners and cry babies who have now made themselves known. Thank you for your shares. And thank you for "dumping" our PNLK.

To: BILL L who wrote (1158)	4/29/1998 7:03:00 PM
From: xclently	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

I likewise question the lack of tolerance of individuals who want to "fill in the blanks." As I stated earlier, if all the answers were known already, the stock would probably be much higher, and never have dipped so low in the first place. I still do not know where the money came from to develop the site, what the shares cost insiders, how the shares came into existence, or whether the float or outstanding figures are accurate. Earlier today, someone spoke with Taylor Smith who said that none of the insider shares were restricted and could be freely traded. If that is the case, then are they part of the float or not?... Another factor is the "missing pieces" of the press releases... >>>PNLK, the world's largest import/export web site, and Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) announced today that ProNetLink has licensed from D&B a database containing key business information on 1.5 million companies involved in international import/export. <<< How much did this licensing agreement cost? I think this company has a great concept, and I share the enthusiasm of the board. When you look at the "big picture", this could be a little "bump in the road". On the other hand, technically, the stock did "gap" at yesterdays open, and we could retest those levels... I don't see that anything awful was done by these "contrary" individuals. Did anyone read over the Investor kit yet...I haven't received mine yet, even though I requested it a week ago. TIA Peter