Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rudy who wrote (1160)	4/29/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Devil's Advocate	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

This is just another stinky stock. I could not disagree more. This is the best Web idea I have encountered so far. It is targeted at businesses with a monthly fee for users. They will provide a unique service for import/export businesses at a very low cost. It will make money a lot faster then any search engine sites.

To: Rudy who wrote (1160)	4/29/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: wmj	Respond to of 8242

This correction was necessary. It is easier and easier to see who the day traders are based on this terrible panic over a 16% correction. If you sold, great for you, so long...stop bad mouthing a great company. If you held (like I did) while the panic-stricken day traders fled, remember why you bought PNLK to begin with. Nothing has fundamentally changed. Look what happened to DGIV when it got ahead of itself (several times)...a classic pullback followed by accumulation and a follow-on surge in the stock price. Any TA would have indicated this was going to happen. And yes, it IS good for the long term investment prospects for PNLK, we can now begin to establish a stronger support base around $4. If you think we are going to stay under $4 for long, keep dreaming. We had a pretty quick (30-minute) correction with relatively low volume. I'm buying more shares from the whiners and cry babies who have now made themselves known. Thank you for your shares. And thank you for "dumping" our PNLK. And by the way Rudy, you spelled "PNLK" wrong. I can send you a private with the correct spelling later if you want.

To: Rudy who wrote (1160)	4/29/1998 5:05:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8242

Au Contraire non-intrested party. Per chance are you also here to help all us little ol "stinky stock"holders understand what were doin wrong? Isn't that nice of you. When you decide whether this company has something going for it, AND you buy some shares, we would surely appreciate you wisdom here on the board. Meanwhile, I don't believe you have any reason to be here, now do you... or do you have "another" reason to hang around.

To: Rudy who wrote (1160)	4/29/1998 5:15:00 PM
From: ThirdEye	Respond to of 8242

Rudy, please tell us all just exactly how you would short a BB stock.

To: Rudy who wrote (1160)	4/29/1998 6:46:00 PM
From: lazarre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

Rudy: Your comment: <<< This is just another stinky stock. We all trying to make a few bucks here (talking about the real and straight individual investors). I somehow got involved here while checking PLNK. But after reading all the hype on this board I changed my mind of buying it.>>>> My question is: why are you still hanging out? If it was for instructive reasons, man, you have yet to deliver. What's your motive?? 2nd question: The D&B factor....a figment?? As an investment guru, I have to believe you have some insight here?? Give it a whirl. Respectfully, Lazarre