Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ER Doc who wrote (1190)	4/29/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

Negative and dissenting "opinions" are not warranted on a board where we should all be engaged in furthering our collective "KNOWLEDGE" about an equity. Negative "opinions" from those that do not own a share are motivated by one thing. Get you to sell out of fear when the MM's start lowering the "bid." Please, carefully, think about the words I've used. I sincerely do not wish to offend any "legitimate" poster. I also welcome negative postings as long as they are factual. We should never be afraid of negative information, as long as it has credibility. Thanks for putting up with my antics... doesn't mean I'll stop, but thanks anyway. Rich

To: ER Doc who wrote (1190)	4/29/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 8242

Jeff: These two "dissenters" made their point with their initial posts. These "dissenters" raised questions about whether or not they felt this stock was worthy of the volume it was trading and the push up in prices it has obtained in a short time span. They said they raised these questions based upon the criteria they use to evaluate a stock. If these "dissenters" real objective was to temper some of our enthusiasm for PNLK, they made their points in their initial posts. They wouldn't have had to reiterate their points repeatedly, unless they had ulterior motives. Again if they were on the up and up, they would not have to pose so many rhetorical questions. They already appear to have their own answers so why post here on this thread and ask us? They seem intent upon manipulation rather than clarification. If their words cause the weak and disbelievers to sell, great. I'll take this "shake out" as an opportunity to add more shares. No matter what statistical information these "dissenters" attempt to dissuade you with, they can't get around the concept of the company and the quality of its associations. Why would accounting, PR, web design, and data base companies of pre-eminent stature affiliate with such a small company if there wasn't any promise here? Why would they risk their own reputations over a "pump and dump"? When this company meets the criteria of some of the "dissenters", which I'm confident that it will, and actually shows earnings, all those people, those day traders, will lament over the money they could have made. This stock represents a great opportunity, if the dissenters fail to see the potential, and the ability of this company to meets its potential based on TA or any of their other analytical methods, so be it. Their loss is our gain. I'm going long, and will add shares in the morning. I'm figuring in the morning there will be a continuation of the sell off until about 11 ET then the stock will level after mid day before showing a .25 to .5 gain for the day. I'm more optimistic about Friday. (What do others think). Though I do have to admit that my over enthusiasm has been tempered from my euphoria after Tuesday's move. By the way I had a great day with ALYA (up 50%) today which helped to balance some of the red ink I had on PNLK. I'll post my insights on th ALYA thread soon if anyone is interested. ztect