Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bmart who wrote (46387)	4/29/1998 9:15:00 PM
From: DJ Byrne	Respond to of 55532

bmart, Thank you , apologize anytime with posts like these... dj

To: bmart who wrote (46387)	4/29/1998 10:05:00 PM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

Thank you.

To: bmart who wrote (46387)	4/29/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: TopCat	Respond to of 55532

bmart, you sound very "inside." Care to share with us who you are and what basis you have for all this "inside" information? I don't mean this from a legal sense....but if you have a basis for this information, you could help this thread very much....otherwise you can only be perceived as "inventing" your information. It is understandable that even you (as an insider) could be wrong about your "Good Friday congratulations." But, what is your connection that allows you to make statements like "Morgan declined the offer for ethical reasons." That's getting into somebody's head....and cannot occur from afar. TC

To: bmart who wrote (46387)	4/29/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore	Respond to of 55532

... But it appears quite evident that it is most difficult for the illegal shortsellers of RMIL. Not much was mentioned on this board about the $.10 trade of 300 shares. Mr. Tonto is very persistent in painting RMIL as criminal, yet that act of the $.10 trade was criminal! It demonstrates very clearly for all to see who can be described as the criminals here. The act speaks loudly. Mr. Tonto failed to mention this act. ... Let me first say that I think the word 'criminal' is a bit too strong. Given the volatility of grey market trading of stocks without market makers, this is exactly the thing one has to expect. Apparently $0.10 was the best price available at the time. I do recall someone offering $0.10 per RMIL share on this very thread at the end of March. If memory serves, I believe that bid represented a substantial raise from his earlier bid ($0.01/share). I guess he didn't want any more shares despite the supposedly imminent short squeeze. Could it be that person doesn't believe in the short squeeze? Well, I suppose not - he probably just wanted others to have the opportunity to profit. No doubt you will wish to suitably chastise that person. Now, if only I could recall his name? ...