Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : lcav -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yosid who wrote (355)	4/30/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: pappy	Respond to of 942

Amen. Palmisano is the one that gave the clue. He stated in yesterdays earnings announcement that Visx is incorrect in their assumption and it contradicts their own 1996 10K. Boy, sure enough, I went and reviewed it and there it was. There was more, but no sense in rubbing it in. As a government employee, I know the power of a contractual agreement and unless there is a "meetings of minds", to amend it or void it, the agreement is as strong as steel. That's the purpose behind an agreement (to protect the participants of the agreement). Not only does VISX do the opposite of its own statements, it does it without ever first attempting to resolve their interpretation with the other partner (which also was a violation of the PPP agreement). "the last shall be first and the first shall be last"...Pappy