SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (5989)4/30/1998 10:24:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10786
 
JDN, PTUS, VIAS, and CMND averaged a 50% hit on their stock price after earnings... based strictly on results that worried stockholders. ALYD only went down 5% and that, as we have seen proof, was mostly because of the actions of one person trying to sell into news. After all that, ALYD is trading at a price higher than it was at the beginning of the week!

With all this talk and threatening private messages being sent to people you would think a bomb was dropped. Oh, I forgot, that's what certain people want you to think. Silly me.

Bottom line, ALYD went from .01 to .09 per share. The price is, knock on wood, going back up, and the Y2K problem has not disappeared.

- Jeff



To: JDN who wrote (5989)4/30/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: Captain Jack  Respond to of 10786
 
JDN--- ALYD was very good to me when I first bought it quite some time ago. A loos at this time would just be giving a little piece of that back. Not a big deal. What I find agrivating is it should NOT be happening. I have heard a dozen different reasons why the price sucks and the only thing viable is the dilution. Gruder did it in the past and his credibility suffered. Those that stuck with a good company only (SO FAR) have been kicked again by him for it. ALYD is good enough to over come him if he would just relax trying to have as many shares outstanding as CPQ!